Pepperstone logo
Pepperstone logo
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • 繁体中文
  • Español
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Português
  • لغة عربية
  • 交易方式

    概览

    定价

    交易账户

    Pro

    高净值客户

    活跃交易者计划

    交易时间

    维护时间表

  • 平台

    概述

    交易平台

    集成

    交易工具

  • 市场与符号

    概述

    外汇

    股票

    交易所交易基金

    指数

    大宗商品

    货币指数

    指数差价合约股息

    股票差价合约股息

    差价合约远期

  • 分析

    概述

    市场导航

    每日简报

    会见分析师

  • 学习交易

    概述

    交易指南

    网络研讨会

  • 合作伙伴

  • 关于我们

  • 帮助和支持

  • 简体中文
  • English
  • 繁体中文
  • Español
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Português
  • لغة عربية

分析

Equities

Magnificent Seven Isn’t The Same Old Tech Story

Michael Brown
Michael Brown
Senior Research Strategist
2024年2月23日
Share
The recent AI frenzy has led plenty to wonder whether this is the ‘dotcom bubble’ all over again, as markets party on like it’s 1999. However, while I assure you that I wasn’t dreaming while writing this note, and that things may still go astray, it seems like markets won’t have to run from the destruction, with no ‘oops, out of time’ moment on the horizon. While life may well just be a party, the party for tech stocks looks like it may indeed be meant to last.

Setting Prince’s lyrical genius to one side – and don’t bother knockin’ on my door if you wish to complain about the puns – it’s worth examining why the landscape for the tech sector, particularly as the S&P 500 becomes increasingly concentrated, as shown below.

Preview

Of course, this concentration has been no bad thing for broader indices thus far, with the vast outperformance of the ‘magnificent seven’ having powered the majority of the gains seen in 2023, and continuing to underpin the market in the early part of 2024, with Nvidia and Meta remaining the standout performers of the bunch.

Preview

Naturally, as with any market that moves a long way in a short period of time, this begs the question as to whether moves have become overextended, and whether a retracement is likely. In this instance, I would argue that it is not, for numerous reasons.

Firstly, within the ‘magnificent seven’ in particular, there is actually a surprisingly diverse range of sectors and industries represented. While easy to slap the ‘tech’ label on all seven stocks and be done with it, this masks the true story – Meta are, at this point, effectively a marketing firm, with advertising revenue making up the bulk of income; Amazon, recently included in the Dow, are a retailer; Tesla, obviously, are an automaker; Alphabet, officially, operates in the Communication Services sector; leaving just Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia as the ‘pure’ tech plays of the bunch.

This diversification is, clearly, in stark contrast to those firms – many of which are no longer with us, or are a shadow of their former selves – which dominated the market during the ‘dotcom bubble’, which were, as the name would suggest, almost entirely and squarely focused on the internet, during its infancy.

On this note, not only are the ‘magnificent seven’ more diversified than the biggest stocks during the ‘dotcom’ era, they also all play a substantially more important role in the broader economy. Clearly, the internet is no longer a new and unknown technology, and plays an integral role in day-to-day life. What the market is presently discounting is that the usage of new technologies, such as AI, which per NVDA’s earnings has reached a ‘tipping point’ towards mass adoption, will continue to grow at, or in excess of, the current pace.

Of course, there is a macro theme here too, if that were indeed to take place. The productivity improvements that increased AI usage may bring across the global economy could, in the longer-run, have a significant impact, potentially resulting in a higher level of r* in the future, all else being equal.

Preview

As for shorter-term considerations, particularly with the tech sector having become somewhat decoupled from interest rates of late, both from a price perspective, and in terms of the firms’ ability to deliver consistent revenues regardless of the interest rate environment, the path of least resistance for the sector looks set to continue leading to the upside.

Not only will this continue to support the handful of stocks in question, it is also likely to provide a tailwind to the US market more broadly. Hence, this should see the US continue to outperform DM equity peers, particularly in Europe, where the concentration of tech names is substantially lower and, in some cases such as London, near non-existent.

Preview

Related articles

Tech’s Dwindling Rate Sensitivity

Tech’s Dwindling Rate Sensitivity

Equities
Risk Rally Rolls On As Nvidia Smash Expectations

Risk Rally Rolls On As Nvidia Smash Expectations

Equities
这里提供的材料并未根据旨在促进投资研究独立性的法律要求进行准备,因此被视为营销沟通。尽管不受任何关于在投资研究传播之前进行交易的禁令,我们不会在向客户提供信息之前寻求任何利益。

Pepperstone不保证这里提供的材料准确、最新或完整,因此不应依赖这些信息。这些信息,无论来自第三方与否,不应被视为推荐;或者买卖的要约;或者购买或出售任何证券、金融产品或工具的邀约;或者参与任何特定的交易策略。它不考虑读者的财务状况或投资目标。我们建议阅读此内容的任何读者寻求自己的建议。未经Pepperstone批准,不得转载或重新分发这些信息。

其他网站.

  • The Trade Off
  • 合作伙伴
  • 组.
  • 职业生涯

交易方式

  • 定价
  • 交易账户
  • Pro
  • 高净值客户
  • 活跃交易者计划
  • 交易时间

平台

  • 交易平台
  • 交易工具

市场与符号

  • 外汇
  • 股票
  • 交易所交易基金
  • 指数
  • 大宗商品
  • 货币指数
  • 加密货币
  • 差价合约远期

分析

  • 市场导航
  • 每日简报
  • Pepperstone 激石脉搏
  • 会见分析师

学习交易

  • 交易指南
  • 视频
  • 在线讲座
Pepperstone logo
support@pepperstone.com
+17866281209
#1 Pineapple House, Old Fort Bay, Nassau, New Providence, The Bahamas
  • 法律文件
  • 隐私政策
  • 网站条款与条件
  • Cookie政策

©2025 Pepperstone Markets Limited |版权所有。公司注册号177174 B |SIAF217

风险警告:差价合约(CFD)是复杂的工具,由于杠杆作用,存在快速亏损的高风险。 81% 的散户投资者在于该提供商进行差价合约交易时账户亏损。您应该考虑自己是否了解差价合约的工作原理,以及是否有承受资金损失的高风险的能力。

您没有基础资产的所有权或权利。过去的表现并不代表未来的表现,税法可能会发生变化。本网站上的信息具有一般性质,并未考虑您或您客户的个人目标,财务状况或需求。请在制定任何交易决定之前阅读我们的RDN和其他法律文件,并确保您完全了解风险。我们鼓励您寻求独立的建议。

Pepperstone Markets Limited位于巴哈马新普罗维登斯市拿骚桑迪波特B201海天巷,并由巴哈马证券委员会(SIA-F217)许可并受其监管。

本网站上的信息以及所提供的产品和服务均不打算分发给任何国家或地区(如果其分发或使用违反当地法律或法规)的任何人。